Author Archives: ipswichtrust
Feoffees Depositions
These are older depositions of the Feoffees taken by the tenants for the Superior Court case.
Tenants Reply to Opposition to Motion for Protective Order
Feoffees Opposition to Motion for Protective Order
This is the Feoffees arguing that they should be allowed to continue to depose individual tenants.
Superior – Feoffees – 080623 – Opposition to Motion for Protective Order
Tenant’s Opposition to Foley Motion for Protective Order and Foley Deposition
Here the Tenants argue that they should be allowed to pursue discovery on James Foley’s file at the Wenham Police Department. Also included is the full text of the deposition of James Foley. This motion ends up being denied, meaning they are not allowed to pursue discovery.
Superior – LNLAC – 080527 – Opposition to Foley Motion for Protective Order
Feoffees Foley Motion for Protective Order
This is the Feoffees asking the court not to allow discovery on James Foley’s personnel file from the Wenham Police Department.
Superior – Feoffees – 080527 – Foley Motion for Protective Order
Additional Citation Supporting Motion for Reconsideration
Attorney General’s Motion for Reconsideration
When the Court allowed the AG’s motion to dismiss counterclaim, it went further into a discussion of whether the Feoffees are a public entity or not. The AG did not think this was appropriate, and so filed this motion for reconsideration.
Feoffees Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration
When the Court allowed the AG’s motion to dismiss counterclaim, it went further into a discussion of whether the Feoffees are a public entity or not. The AG did not think this was appropriate, and so filed this motion for reconsideration. The Feoffees, on the other hand, loved it because it supported their argument that they are a private entity. So they filed this opposition to the AG’s motion.
Superior – Feoffees – 080115 – Opposition to Motion for Reconsideration
Decision on Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
This is the decision the Feoffees rely on to support their claim that they are a private trust not subject to the Open Meeting Law. The Attorney General felt that this decision went too far, and filed a motion for reconsideration, but never followed through on it.
Superior – Court – 071218 – Decision on Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
Ipswich Citizens for Public Trust 